Male
circumcision is increasingly being used in Africa to help halt the spread of
HIV/AIDS. Surveys show the infection rate can fall by up to 60 percent. Rwanda
has launched a new non-surgical form of circumcision.
"It
didn't hurt, it wasn't bad at all," says Marc Karemangingo with a mixture
of pride and embarrassment. The 18 year-old has just been circumcised. In an
operation lasting just 15 minutes, doctors removed his foreskin. Marc is now
standing outside the Military Hospital in the Rwandan capital Kigali. Behind
him, an unobtrusive sign shows the way to the "Center for Male
Circumcision." The young Rwandan was very scared before the operation.
"But the doctor was very nice and chatted with me. It was done very
well," he said.
Fewer HIV
infections
Marc is one
of 200,000 men in Rwanda who have undergone circumcision as part of a
government program. That is not many when compared to the goal of two million
which the government had set for the end of this year.
 |
| Men can be circumcised free of charge in many Rwandan hospitals |
Dr Sabin
Nsanzimana heads the HIV/AIDS department. "When we started this program,
we were very ambitious," he said. Previous strategies had yielded meager
results. Not least because it was not possible to measure condom use
accurately. The effects of circumcision can be assessed more easily. There are
also other advantages, Dr Nsanzimana says. "It is easy, not expensive and
you don't need to repeat it."
2.9 percent
of Rwandans are infected with HIV, that's three out of every hundred people. In
contrast, the infection rate in Germany is below 0.1 percent, while in Botswana
in southern Africa it is 23 percent. East African researchers discovered that
the risk of contracting HIV is up to 60 percent less for a circumcised man when
compared to his non-circumcised counterpart.
While
circumcision does not rule out contracting AIDS, international organisations
like UNAIDS and the World Health Organisation (WHO) regard circumcision as an
effective weapon in the struggle to halt the spread of the disease.
It is also
being promoted in Kenya and Uganda. In those countries, it is not yet clear by
how much the the infection rate has been reduced. Scientists believe that
circumcision alters the environment for microbes on the penis and this could
make it difficult for viruses and bacteria to survive.
When the
campaign began in Rwanda, only 13 percent of men were circumcised, most of them
were Muslims. 90 percent of Rwandans are Catholic. "It took some time to
persuade people that this has nothing to do with religion. It's about
protection and prevention," Dr Nsnazimana told DW.
New method
In the
meantime, the level of acceptance has increased. Men come to the health centers
from all over the country. In Kigali's Military Hospital, an average of 25 men
per day come to be circumcised. There are plans to increase the number to one
thousand per week. This will be possible thanks to a new method of circumcision
which can be carried out non-surgically. The magic word is "PrePex."
It consists of two rings and an elastic band. Dr Leon Ngeruka, from Kigali's
Military Hospital, explains how it works. "The inner ring is placed over
the penis and the foreskin is puilled over it. An elastic ring made of plastic
is then stretched over both to compress the skin. This blocks the flow of blood
and the foreskin falls off about a week later."
Not a
substitute for condoms
Circumcision
should not be viewed as protection against unwanted pregnancies or
sexually-transmitted diseases.
 |
| The new PrePex method doesn't need the surgeon's knife |
To get the
message across, men are counselled before and after being circumcised so that
they are fully aware of what it means for their sexual future. For Marc
Karemangingo, that future includes condoms. "Young people like me should
be able to grow up without HIV/AIDS. We must use condoms in order to protect
our lives," he said.
Related Articles:
Question: Dear and beloved Kryon: What should we know about "Brit-Mila" (Jewish circumcision)?
Answer: All circumcision was based on commonsense health issues of the day, which manifested itself in religious-based teaching. That basically is what made people keep doing it. This eighth-day-from-birth ritual is no more religious today than trimming your fingernails (except that Brit-Mila is only done once, and it hurts a bit more).
It's time to start seeing these things for what they are. Common sense is not static. It's dynamic, and related to the culture of the time. Yesterday's common sense about health changed greatly with the discovery of germs. It changed again with practices of cleanliness due to the discovery of germs, and so on. Therefore, we would say that it really doesn't make a lot of difference in today's health practices. It's done almost totally for cultural historic and traditional purposes and holds no energy around it other than the obvious intent of the tradition.
This is also true for a great deal of the admonishments of the Old Testament regarding food and cleanliness, and even the rules of the neighborhood (such as taking your neighbor's life if he steals your goat, or selling your daughter in slavery if you really need the money... all found in scripture). The times are gone where these things matter anymore, yet they're still treated with reverence and even practiced religiously in some places. They're now only relics of tradition, and that's all. If you feel that you should honor a tradition, then do it. If not, then don't. It's not a spiritual or health issue any longer.
Be the boss of your own body and your own traditions. Follow what your spiritual intuition tells you is appropriate for your own spiritual path and health.
No comments:
Post a Comment