Want China Times, Xinhua 2014-09-27
Lawmakers in Beijing have reviewed a draft law on smoking, this time including a ban on smoking in offices occupied by a single person, for the second time on Thursday.
A non-smoking sign in a public square in Shenzhen. (Photo/CNS) |
Lawmakers in Beijing have reviewed a draft law on smoking, this time including a ban on smoking in offices occupied by a single person, for the second time on Thursday.
In the
previous draft, smoking was prohibited in public areas, public transport and
shared working places. The draft now includes single occupancy offices after
controversy over company bosses often being exempt from smoking controls
because they have their own office.
Angela
Pratta, who is leading the Tobacco Free Initiative of the World Health
Organization (WHO) in China, said, "if single occupancy offices are
allowed to be exempt from smoke-free laws, then co-workers, cleaning staff and
others who have to enter these offices, or who work nearby, would be exposed to
second-hand smoke."
"As a
result, we removed the word 'shared'," said Wang Qingbin, an associate law
professor at the China University of Political Science and Law.
"This
move showed how public opinion pushed forward anti-smoking legislation,"
he said.
China is
home to over 300 million smokers, with more than one million people dying as a
result of tobacco-related illness each year, according to the WHO.
The country
signed the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in 2003 and it
became effective in 2006. According to the FCTC, China should have banned
smoking in indoor public areas completely by 2011. However, it is not unusual
to see smokers puff away in restaurants, bars and hair salons.
Beijing
banned smoking in public places such as schools, hospitals, banks and public
transport in March 2008, before the Olympics. It also stipulated that in places
such as restaurants and parks, there should be specific smoking areas.
However,
this rule was poorly implemented. As a result, people expected the new law to
be more feasible.
The new
regulation underlined that "relevant work units be responsible for tobacco
control".
"This
is a step forward," said Wang Delin, vice chairperson of the Legislative
Affairs Committee of the Beijing Municipal People's Congress. "This means
that in case of poor implementation, someone will be punished."
After the
first review of the rule in July, amendments were made also to make it appear
more practical.
For
instance, in the first draft, hotels and airports were listed as places where
smoking was strictly prohibited. But in the second draft, the areas were
changed to "hotels without ventilation system, and airports, apart from
the smoking rooms."
If the law
is too strict to enforce, what's the point of having it, some experts said.
Other
experts, including Wang Qingbin, expressed disappointment over the new rule.
"I
doubt whether the ventilation systems for 'smoking rooms' will be
effective," he said. "Another problem is, what if there is no
non-smoking room left in a hotel? Will the customer be forced to use a smoking
room, and endure the second-hand smoke left there?"
"The
WHO is extremely dismayed to see these loopholes appear in the draft Beijing
law," said Pratta. "Exemptions to 100% smoke-free laws create
enforcement difficulties." Smoke will drift out of those rooms where
smoking would be allowed, making it difficult to tell if someone has broken the
law, she said.
"These
loopholes would make Beijing's law incompatible with China's obligations under
the FCTC," Pratta continued. "Loopholes and exemptions make
smoke-free laws harder to enforce, not easier."
Other
experts saw hope from the draft and the reviews. "This is a very good
beginning," said Wu Yiqun, deputy director with ThinkTank Research Center
for Health Development, a Beijing-based non-governmental organization.
"Only
after we have a strong law will people pay attention to the problem," she
said.
A vote for
the law will be carried out next January. It is not known whether the draft
will be reviewed again.
Related Article:
No comments:
Post a Comment