Three years
after the worst nuclear accident in a generation, the Japanese prefecture is
reporting a rise in the number of children showing cancer symptoms. But is this
directly related to the disaster, or is the testing more rigorous?
The Guardian, Justin McCurry in Fukushima, Sunday 9 March 2014
 |
| Young children play in a Red Cross 'Smile Park' - a play facility set up for Fukushima's children in Fukushima city. Photograph: Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert |
When
doctors found several tiny nodules on his 12-year-old daughter's thyroid gland,
Toshiyuki Kamei refused to let parental fear get the better of him. The
symptoms are not uncommon, and the probability that they will develop into
something more serious is low.
Yet Kamei
can be forgiven for occasional moments of doubt: his daughter, Ayako, is one of
almost 400,000 children who were living in Fukushima on 11 March 2011 – the
start of the world's worst nuclear accident for a quarter of a century.
"As a
parent, of course I worry, but my daughter is taking it in her stride,"
said Kamei, who lives in Iwaki, a city about 40km (25 miles) south of the
wrecked Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. "She doesn't tell me if
it's on her mind, and I've decided not to ask her about it."
Three years
after the plant suffered a triple meltdown that released huge quantities of radiation into the atmosphere, medical authorities in Fukushima prefecture are
reporting a significant rise in the number of thyroid cancer cases among local
children and young adults.
 |
| A doctor conducts a thyroid examination on four-year-old Maria Sakamoto in Iwaki town. Photograph: Damir Sagolj/Reuters |
The results
have prompted a bitter debate about the potential effects the meltdown had on
the health of hundreds of thousands of children. Either the higher-than-normal
rates of thyroid cancer are connected to the nuclear accident, or they are the
inevitable result of a testing regime unprecedented in size, and conducted
using state-of-the-art medical equipment.
Last month,
the number of confirmed and suspected cases of thyroid cancer among people aged
18 or below at the time of the accident rose to 75, compared with 59 at the end
of last September. Of the current total, 33 cases have been confirmed as
cancer.
Under the
guidance of Fukushima Medical University, local health authorities have so far
tested 254,000 out of 375,000 Fukushima children and adolescents, who will
continue to be screened regularly throughout their lives.
Medical
officials in Japan dismissed a link with the nuclear accident, but conceded
that the results required further analysis.
"We
hope to look for unknown types of gene mutations, other than those known to be
associated with the generation of thyroid gland cancer, to study if they could
serve as markers for determining if the cancers were induced by
radiation," said Shinichi Suzuki, a professor of thyroid gland surgery at
the university.
At first
sight, the figures give cause for alarm. Thyroid cancer normally affects one to
two people per million among 10 to 14-year-olds in Japan, a rate far lower than
observed in Fukushima, although tests there apply to people aged up to 18.
 |
| The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant pictured in August 2013. Photograph: Kyodo/Reuters |
Inevitably,
parallels have been drawn with the 1986 disaster in Chernobyl. Estimates vary,
but according to the UN Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, more than
6,000 cases of thyroid cancer among exposed children and adolescents living in
Ukraine, Russia and Belarus had been reported by 2005. There, no attempt was
made to prevent children from drinking milk or eating leafy vegetables, leaving
them vulnerable to ingesting dangerous amounts of the radionuclide iodine-131,
a recognised cause of thyroid cancer.
But experts
familiar with both disasters caution against making similarly gloomy
predictions for the children of Fukushima. Dillwyn Williams, emeritus professor
of pathology at Cambridge University, pointed out that a noticeable increase in
thyroid cancers was not observed until three to four years after the Chernobyl
accident.
"Much
less radioactivity was released from Fukushima than from Chernobyl," he
said. "Most of [the Fukushima radiation] was blown over the Pacific Ocean,
and thyroid doses in the most-affected areas are low compared to Chernobyl.
"It is
very unlikely there will be a large increase in thyroid cancer or any other
health problems, apart from anxiety and psychological difficulties. That does
not mean the surveillance should stop. There were surprises after Chernobyl and
there may be again after Fukushima."
Williams
and other experts have attributed the large number of cases to the use of
hypersensitive ultrasound, which can detect the tiniest lesions, and the large
number of children being tested.
In
Fukushima, the first recorded cases of thyroid cancer – whose latent period can
be between four or five years to several decades – came just a year after the
meltdown. In Chernobyl, it took four years before cancer rates rose.
"The
similarity in the public response to both accidents arises from a lack of
awareness of the population about the real dangers and risks of radiation
exposure," said Prof Konstantin Kotenko, director general of the state
research centre at the Federal Medical Biological Agency in Moscow. "After
the both accidents the following was observed among the members of the public:
fear and negative stereotypes due to exaggeration of the danger of ionising
radiation, symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress. Undoubtedly, these
perceptions of radiation have a negative impact on the health of the
population, including children."
Gerry
Thomas, professor of molecular pathology at Imperial College, London
University, blames growing anxiety among Fukushima residents on
"pseudo-scientists who can shout louder than real scientists".
 |
| A girl holds a placard during an anti-nuclear demonstration in Tokyo on 11 September 2011, six months on from the devastating Japan tsunami. Photograph: Toru Yamanaka/AFP/Getty |
"The
biggest effect will be psychological – just as it was post-Chernobyl,"
said Thomas, who insists the rising number of cases is due to comprehensive
screening, not radiation. "I still stick with what I have always said:
there will not be a single death due to the radiological consequences of this
accident."
But
scientists have struggled to reach a consensus over the possible health effects
of prolonged exposure to relatively low levels of radiation. While the World
Health Organisation and other UN agencies praised the Japanese authorities for
ordering the swift evacuation of neighbourhoods close to Fukushima Daiichi,
their decision soon after to raise the allowable annual radiation exposure
limit from one to 20 millisieverts [mSv] put children in danger, said Dr Paul
Dorfman of the Energy Institute at University College, London.
"This
is inexplicable, since 20mSv is the allowable dose for an adult radiation
worker," Dorman said. "Given that infants and children are still in
their developmental stage, they should not have been subjected to this dose.
"Unfortunately,
what this means is that we may be seeing increased ill health in the future.
Not simply gross cancers and possibly heart problems, but also things that are
difficult to detect through epidemiology, such as immune problems."
The anxiety
felt by parents in Fukushima stems from a widespread lack of trust in the local
medical authorities, which have come under government pressure not to cause
alarm among residents.
The
Japanese government has resisted calls from parents to conduct comparable screenings
among children in a region of Japan that was not affected by the disaster.
That, radiation experts say, would at least establish whether or not the
thyroid cancer spike in Fukushima is out of the ordinary.
"It is
such an obvious measure that could be completed in about six months, but the
government has done absolutely nothing for three years," said Koichiro
Ono, a local kindergarten teacher. "The government is worried that if the
results suggest that there is a link, it will ruin its plans to restart nuclear
reactors."
As
north-east Japan prepares to mark the third anniversary of the disaster, in
which almost 20,000 people died – most of them in two prefectures north of
Fukushima – the country's leaders are trying to put a positive spin on the recovery
effort.
During a
recent visit to a Fukushima village where the evacuation order imposed in March
2011 has been partially lifted, prime minister Shinzo Abe congratulated
residents on taking a crucial step towards resuming the lives they were forced
to put on hold after their homes were irradiated.
Kamei,
however, was not impressed. "How can anyone talk about life returning to
normal in Fukushima until everything has been done to ensure that people have
their health?" he said. "Politicians keep talking about recovery, but
that doesn't mean anything to people living around here."
Related Articles:
"Fast-Tracking" - Feb 8, 2014 (Kryon Channelling by Lee Carroll) - New (Reference to Fukushima / H-bomb nuclear pollution > 20 Min)
No comments:
Post a Comment